Where has All the Seagrass Gone?

JK Trout on Fly

There will be far fewer larger spotted seatrout in the Indian River Lagoon in the coming years because of the die off of sea grass beds.

A couple of weeks ago two anglers wandered into the Lagoon House.  Their first words to me were, “What happened to all the sea grass that used to be in the Lagoon? We fished all along these shores from south of Sebastian to north of Melbourne, and the bottom is almost bare. What’s up with that?”

I shook my head, and said, “Let me tell you an ugly little story about beautiful green grass lawns.”

Now, before we go any farther I must confess, I once had a serious infatuation with green grass. No, I’m not referring to the stuff some smoke, but to the kind that people plant in their yards. See, when we first moved from north of Tampa to Florida’s east coast I owned and operated Clean Cut Landscaping and Lawn Maintenance, a business that a partner and I started in Tampa back in 1977. Much of the service we provided to many of our customers living in the Indian River Lagoon’s watershed was geared toward keeping their lawns lush, green and well-manicured. It was this business that gave us the financial ability to start the fishing guide business we began 1990.

What I learned about people and their St. Augustine grass, the primary turf grass of Florida is down right scary:

  • Many people judge themselves and their neighbors by the appearance of their lawn.
  • The vast majority of these people will do anything possible to have flawless green grass lawns.
  • Hardly anyone has the slightest clue how much they are damaging our environment and quality of life, killing the Indian River Lagoon and impacting other significant estuaries and wildlife by coddling their lawns.

When I found out, I felt an urgent need to change my ways, and rid our yard of green grass.

See it is the fertilizers, insecticides and herbicides contributing heavily to the demise of our nation’s greatest lagoon system by destroying the prodigious sea grass beds that have made them world famous for good fishing, water fowl and beauty. Sea grass is the foundation and cornerstone of the Indian River, Banana River and Mosquito Lagoons. Without healthy sea grass, the lagoons will not be able to support the plethora of marine mammals, fish, crabs, shrimp, and other critters depending on it for survival.

There was been a disastrous algae bloom in the Indian River Lagoon. I have seen many my lifetime, but nothing like this. Due to an odd pattern of alternating dry and wet spells, unseasonably warm weather, and an overabundance of nutrients, algae thrived to the point of blocking out the sun light and killing the six types of sea grass in the Lagoon (This link leads to a decent IFAS article,  Sea grass Beds of the Indian River Lagoon. Unfortunately UF’s Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences (IFAS) program, with financial backing from the major fertilizer and lawn chemical manufactures, has presented much damaging and misguided information to government agencies against sensible fertilizing ordinances.) Heavy rains reduced the salinity of the brackish water and washed an intense concoction of fertilizer, herbicides, and other contaminants (untreated) into the system.

It is time to “tap out” of this strangle hold. To fix this problem we need to stop coddling this finicky St. Augustine grass. Let’s start changing the way we design our landscapes and treat the environment by making wiser choices about fertilizer use, insecticides and herbicides. Putting it as simple as possible, the more healthy sea grass beds we have the more fish, crabs, shrimp and other marine species we’ll see coming from our waterways.

Written by Captain Rodney Smith.

February 14, 2012,  3:45 p.m. The sun peeks in and out of a growing blanket of high wispy cirrus clouds / Air Temp. 63 °/ Water Temp. 68° / 62rH / East wind, 7 mph / 30.15 steady / Waves are a solid two-to-four feet, semi-glassy.

The Perils of Politics and Powerful Pelicans

Gliding at 43 mph for two miles, a quad-squad of brown pelican guided elegantly north paralleling the beach and Atlantic Ocean’s ecotone across a blue and crimson-pink sky. From the windshield of our Toyota Matrix I observed them effortlessly flapping their eight-foot wing span only three times as I clock them. Within a couple blinks of the eyes, while I negotiated the road and traffic the quad-squad gracefully merge with a second quad-squad!  Together they made a fast descent into a hard bank turn, dropping from the sky like mini B-52 Bombers — true to their target.

This reminded me of a recent voyage, via a wet-pavement down I-95 south into West Palm Beach to visit Florida’s first LEED Gold Certified School Pine Jog Elementary. I’d been invited to speak to a cafeteria packed with K-to 5th graders and their dads by Snook and Gamefish Foundation Director, and Pine Jogs Speech Therapist, aka Speech-Language Pathologist, Brett Fitzgerald. Brett’s also a serious angler and a passionate conservation advocate.

Kids delivered baskets of freshly picked produce they sowed from their insanely bountiful gardens to smiling office staff who placed them out for sale at the front desk, as I fumbled with the visitor’s computer to print my security badge. When I arrived the cafeteria was seriously alive with dads, kids and high energy. The enthusiasm is as high as the volume. After inoculating the crowd with tales of tarpon slime and hints of fishing nirvana, Brett and I toured his school. I found Pine Jog’s advancements relating to the surrounding community and sustainability of our environment was unsurpassed by anything I’d ever seen.

It will take special leadership of men and women like Brett to see that more schools are established that are grounded and energy efficient as Pine Jog Elementary. Brett was correct in saying my trip will be worthwhile. What I experienced during my Pine Jog sojourn was refreshing and hopeful. It’s a place where administration, staff, teachers, parents and kids, all work together for a better tomorrow, not a bigger paycheck.

Today’s politicians could learn a thing or two by visiting a place like Pine Jog.

Until nextime . . . have fun, and be safe out there!  Captain Rodney Smith

July IRC Stormwater Newsletter

Please post and distribute as appropriate.

In the attached July newsletter, learn about…

  • It’s simple to register for the Saturday, JULY 23 – 4th Annual Treasure Coast Waterway Clean-up, 8 a.m. – 12:30. Just complete the attached form and fax/mail to MIATC, PO Box 1639, Stuart, FL, 34995, fax (772) 781-4240. E-mail:  info@tcwaterwaycleanup.com / Phone (772) 285-1646

  • What items under your sink at home qualify as “household hazardous waste” and how should you properly dispose of it?

  • The estimated number of pounds of plastic pollution that enter the world’s oceansevery hour: 2.4 million - See a piece of artwork that depicts this number.

  • What purpose do cattails serve?

  • The area’s only indoor farmer’s market with fresh produce, flowers, antiques, jewelry, recycled art and other fine collectibles starts on July 16 hosted by KIRB at the Indian River Mall.

  • Mulching is one way to “Slow the Flow of Water on Your Property”

  • What are the top 5 most common pollutant-producing behaviors?

  • Fertilizing tips for your lawn

  • Remember, only rain goes down stormdrains:

All other water MUST go to sanitary sewer.

Protecting Indian River County’s waterways through NPDES* compliance and education,

Diane Wilson

Storm Water Education Coordinator

Indian River County Public Works Department

1801 27th Street - Administration Building A

Vero Beach, FL 32960-3388

Email: dwilson@ircgov.com Office Phone 772-226-1565   Fax 772-778-9391

Website: www.ircStormwater.com

Facebook.com/IRCGOV

Twitter:  IRCGOV

*National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

Http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/stormwater/npdes/docs/phase2/fact2-0.pdf

Clean-ups could become “A Thing of the Past”…

Clean-ups are beneficial but wouldn’t it be nice not to need them?

The major cause of water pollution is from contaminants (chemicals including those in fertilizers,

pesticides, pet waste, auto fluids and septic tank leakage) carried and deposited by rainwater

from homeowners’ yards to our waterways: this is referred to as stormwater runoff. Keep

in mind that many storm drains lead directly to waterbodies, without treatment. Visitwww.ircStormwater.com

to learn stormwater runoff pollution prevention practices and begin reducing water pollution today!

Become Involved – contact Event Coordinator

April Price (772) 285-1646 info@TCwaterwaycleanup.com

 

YELLOWFIN

In Hawaii and around a large potion of the Pacific, they’re known simply as ahi.

East coasters refer to them as yellowfin, while French and Portuguese anglers often called albacore. You can agree or disagree on what we call these large and powerful pelages, but if you have ever had the wonderful opportunity to catch or see these

fish in the wild you’d agree that they are spectacular species. One of the largest tuna species, reaching over 400 pounds, they’re found in the worldwide in both tropical and subtropical waters.

 

Commercial fisheries catch these fish with purse seines, loglines and, even, in a few cases, pole and line is used around the Maldives, Ghana and by a small number of vessels fishing out of the Canary Islands in the far east Atlantic. Over the past generation purse seine nets have caught the majority of the world’s commercial yellowfin tuna catch. This type of fishing has been very controversial because of its potential by-catch of marine mammals such as bottlenose dolphin, spinner dolphin and other porpoises.

 

Around the world yellowfin are also a very valuable recreational catch. Not only are they delicious raw or cooked, but many anglers believe that large yellowfin tuna are, pound for pound, the fastest and strongest of all big game tunas. Large and accommodating “long range” charter boats in the Southern California fish in U.S. and Mexican waters, taking thousands of recreational anglers searching for yellowfin tuna and other pelages each year.

GOVERNMENTS INCAPABLE OF MANAGING TUNA

PARIS – Dr. Susan Lieberman, director of international policy for the Pew Environment Group, issued this statement today in response to decisions made at this year’s meeting of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas.

“ICCAT member governments today adopted measures to protect oceanic whitetip and hammerhead sharks, but were unable to provide real protection for Atlantic bluefin tuna and several other species of sharks whose populations are in jeopardy. Denying critical protection for some of the most threatened and iconic fish in the ocean is inexcusable.

“Despite sound science to show how threatened these species are—and all the recent evidence of fraud, laundering and illegal fishing—Atlantic bluefin tuna once again were denied the protection they desperately need. ICCAT member governments had more than enough information to act decisively. They failed to do so.

“They failed to protect the spawning grounds for Atlantic bluefin, either in the Gulf of Mexico or the Mediterranean. They failed to suspend, or even significantly reduce, this fishery until effective management measures are in place and illegal fishing is brought under control. They agreed to only minor reductions in Atlantic bluefin catch limits in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean, while adopting only cosmetic efforts to promote enforcement and compliance.

“Japan, the United States, the European Union and other member governments had an opportunity to secure meaningful protection for bluefin tuna this week. The inability of ICCAT member governments to make significant decisions to improve the health of Atlantic bluefin tuna and shark populations reflects the failure of a system that was set up largely by fishing countries on behalf of fishing interests.

“It is now clear that the entire management system of high seas fisheries is flawed and inadequate. The time for letting the fox guard the hen house is over; we call upon governments that care about healthy ocean ecosystems to overhaul this broken system.”

High definition b-roll and high resolution photos of Atlantic bluefin and sharks can be accessed online at www.pewenvironment.org/ICCAT.

The Pew Environment Group is the conservation arm of The Pew Charitable Trusts, a nongovernmental organization that applies a rigorous, analytical approach to improve public policy, inform the public and stimulate civic life. For more information, go to www.pewenvironment.org/ICCAT.

###

 

BACKGROUND

  • The 17th Special Meeting for the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) concluded late Saturday, November 27, after days of closed-door negotiations to agree to catch limits and conservation measures for the western and eastern Atlantic (Mediterranean) bluefin tuna. Catch limits were ultimately set at 12,900 metric tons for the Mediterranean fishery and 1,750 metric tons for the West.
  • In Paris, ICCAT countries failed to protect the spawning grounds for Atlantic bluefin tuna, either in the Gulf of Mexico or the Mediterranean. Japan and other countries achieved additional enforcement and compliance measures, in order to address the rampant illegal fishing and extensive black market in bluefin tuna, but these efforts are meaningless and cosmetic unless the population recovers.
  • In October, the European Commissioner for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs, Maria Damanaki, proposed cutting the Mediterranean quota of bluefin tuna to 6,000 tons, which would have given the population a greater chance of rebuilding by 2022. This proposal was ultimately overturned, with the EU saying it was now “taking into consideration the interests of the tuna fishermen.” EU Member States agreed to a negotiating mandate at ICCAT which was not based on the recommendation of the European Commission. The United States called for a reduction in quotas in both the eastern and western fisheries at the beginning of ICCAT and ultimately agreed to a minimal reduction of 50 tons for the western Atlantic population.
  • In  March 2010, Atlantic bluefin tuna was proposed for listing under Appendix I under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Despite support from the United States and the European Union, the proposal was brought down by intense lobbying from Japan, who stated that ICCAT, not CITES, was the relevant body to manage the fishery.  Japan staked its reputation on achieving meaningful measures for bluefin at ICCAT and is now going home empty handed.
  • While protection secured at this year’s ICCAT meeting will help Atlantic populations of oceanic whitetips and all species of Atlantic hammerheads (except for bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo), ICCAT members had the opportunity to agree to other strong proposals that would have significantly improved management and conservation for other species of sharks including porbeagle and common thresher. Measures were agreed that bans retention of any oceanic whitetip sharks and for almost all hammerhead sharks in the Atlantic. Developing coastal countries may have coastal fisheries for domestic consumption, but international trade of fins is prohibited. The measure agreed on shortfin mako is a restatement of data collection requirements that were already decided in 2004.
  • Deciding on conservation or management measures for just a few shark species per year is no way to protect these vulnerable animals. ICCAT also did not reach consensus on a proposal that would have improved the effectiveness of the current finning ban by requiring that all sharks are landed with their fins naturally attached to the body.
  • Sharks are clearly different from most bony fish in terms of productivity with their unusually low reproductive rates and extreme vulnerability to overfishing. To put this in terms of those familiar with ICCAT’s history, a shortfin mako that was born 18 years ago in 1993, while ICCAT was meeting in Spain, will just now be close to reaching reproductive maturity and may give birth to only three to 18 pups at some point between the 2011 and 2012 meetings.
  • More than half of the shark species taken in high-seas fisheries are classified as Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Up to 73 million sharks are killed annually to support the global shark fin trade.
  • Conservation groups are calling for increased transparency at ICCAT and other fisheries meetings. Press must be allowed to attend the meeting and conservation organizations should be required to participate in working groups, as a shift away from closed-door sessions that characterize these meetings.
  • Last month, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) published the results of a seven-month-long inquiry into ICCAT member nations’ management of bluefin stocks in the Mediterranean. ICIJ revealed waste, fraud, and rampant mismanagement in the reporting of bluefin catch totals, resulting in a $4 billion black market in bluefin tuna between 1998 and 2007.
  • Contact: Dave Bard, +1 202.486.4426 (U.S. mobile), +33.61.076.7156 (local Paris mobile), dbard@pewtrusts.org

 

FOUL GEAR: DESTRUCTIVE FISHING GEAR & PRATICES

For starts we contacted all sides; recreational anglers, fishing industry and business participants, commercial fishers, government officials and conservation authorities with our request for input on our new column, Foul Gear.

We certainly were surprised by some of the responses we received. Overwhelmingly they were either focusing on the gear or actions of commercial or recreational fishers, but only a few responders combined bad gear and practices of both sides.

However, despite the wide diversity of the people we surveyed there was a ringing consensus among all who contributed to this inaugural column on at least three sides.

All who responded agreed more needs to be done to sustain our fisheries; and that education was paramount; and they were passionate about fisheries management.

On the recreational side fishing with J hooks got a thumb’s down while circle hooks got the thumb’s up. Practices like catch and release and using dehooking devices to release fish received a serious thumb’s up. We were surprised not to get any comments on bending down a hook’s barb and decreasing the use of treble hooks.

The recreational anglers got negative flack on their ability to use electronic devices like the GPS to tune into superior fishing grounds time and time again.

Here’s a look at a few of the suggestions we received.

Commercial Side

1) Bottom trawling for shrimp and fish

2. Purse seine

3. Pelagic Long line

4. Strike netting

5. Fish traps

6. Bottom long line

7. Pair trawls

8. Shrimp farming

9. Salmon farming

10. Inshore otter door trawling.

11. Bad politics (apparently in places like North Carolina the feeling is that the Marine Fisheries Commission is owned/operated by the commercial fishing industry)

12. Ghost nets or lost gear

Recreational Side

1)    TV show host holding fish out of the water for to long, while talking about it

2)    Misuse of Boca Grip style tools

3)    Mishandling fish. Holding large fish vertically, placing hands into their gills.

4)    The killing, wasting or mishandling of undesired or under size species

5)    Fish placed into a freezer and forgotten

6)    Discarded fishing line

7)    Littering

8)    Disregard for fishing regulations

There were a number of other issues that came up during this survey including tuna ranching, over capitalized industrial commercial fleets, poor regulations and enforcement internationally and finally, global climate change due to our carbon use, specifically ocean acidification, water temperature rise in both salt % fresh water and sea level rise affecting near shore waters and habitat and salinity.

 

GREEN GRASS KILLING FLORIDA

Florida’s waterways are in peril. Increasing death rates of bottle-nose dolphins and diminishing populations of marine life are observable evidence that we are polluting our waters. If we don’t take action, the waters will “die” and become algae soups, producing no marine animals and exuding toxic fumes, such as Red Tide, harmful to people. This already has happened in some of our lakes and streams and Tampa Bay came close.

A major source of this pollution is the nutrients found in fertilizer- phosphorus and nitrogen. We Floridians are known to over fertilize and use too much of these nutrients. The excess runs off and ends up in our surface waters. Both phosphorus and nitrogen produce algae, one pound of fertilizer can produce 500 pounds of the stuff. The algae cloud the water and restrict sunlight from reaching the sea grasses. Sea grass is the foundation of most marine life, the nursery and habitat for nearly every living creature. As the sea grass dies off from lack of sunlight, the wild life follows. Algae also consume  dissolved oxygen, robbing the marine animals of this essential element. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) found, in 2008, that 1000 miles of rivers, 350,000 acres of lakes and 900 square miles of estuaries are nutrient polluted. Our waters are receiving at least 50% more nutrients than they can safely absorb.

The good news is that, by managing our use of fertilizer, we can reduce the nutrient pollution by as much as 30% and have healthier lawns in the bargain. Fact is, most Florida soil is naturally rich in phosphorus and adding more is harmful to lawn health as well as running off to pollute the water. Fertilizer containing water soluble nitrogen tends to run off at the first rainfall or irrigation and is wasted. Slow release nitrogen, however, will feed the grass at a rate that it can absorb while minimizing run off. Fertilize properly using the right fertilizer, zero phosphorus and slow release nitrogen, and doing it at the right time is about all it takes.

You might think this no cost measure to help save Florida’s multi-billion dollar marine industry is a no brainer. Think again. The Florida DEP published an ordinance to manage the use of fertilizer state wide. Good idea, but lobbying and pressure from fertilizer interests so weakened the ordinance that it is ineffective in reducing nutrient pollution.

Over 40 local Florida governments have enacted ordinances that are stronger than the state version. The reported results of these ordinances have been positive in every aspect and the stronger ordinance is being considered by many other locals. But hold on, bills are now working in both the Florida House and Senate to change the state fertilizer laws so that local governments cannot enact tougher fertilizer requirements and will even void some local ordinances already in effect. If passed, to accommodate special interests, these bad bills will allow nutrient pollution to continue to degrade our waters and could result in costs of billions of dollars to clean up our waters in addition to the loss of billions by our marine economy. Tell your state representatives to oppose these bills and tell your local government leaders to enact the stronger fertilizer ordinance. Please do it now.

 

David Botto, former chairman of Florida’s Marine Resources Council

 

 

STAMPS & COINS IN THE OUTDOORS

Better Than Watching Tarzan Movies?

As a kid growing up I usually went to school under some type of distress! One of my favorite excuses was, “I can’t find my shoes.” Most of the time they were outside somewhere left behind along the shores of a local pond or lake. As kids we spent nearly all our time outdoors fishing or playing in the surrounding woods. However, now and then, there was a down time, and like some of you, I spent my time collecting postage stamps and coins.

Sorting them, file them away and placing them in books and such was not only fun, but also an uplifting lesson in history and geography. For me it was more fun than school with the similar history and cultural lessons.

Looking back one can only image how seeing and handling coins and stamps depicting scenes of natives fishing, or hunting in their traditional methods was not only inspirationally motivating, but also mystically intriguing.

For instance, the outdoor action, taking place on the stamps issued by the British Solomon Islands was astounding. Between 1908 and 1913 they began issuing a series of canoeing stamps. Year to year these stamps changed, but the images of locals living life large, hunting and gathering from the land and water in far away lands, strange and distance from the average kid’s life probably has influence the sense of adventure in many of us.

Bahamian coins have also long earned a reputation for the outdoor images they represent; bottle-nosed dolphin leaping, a sailboat making its way though choppy seas, bonefish cruising shallow flats and sailfish leaping are only a few of the scenes they depict.

Stamps and coins have long been a way to share a nation’s heritage and traditions with visitors and its citizens. You may be one of the many anglers who recall the plate of five 29 cent fly stamps released by the U.S. Postal Service in 1991. Placing flies tied by the likes of Stu Apte, Jock Scott, Lefty Kreh, and Lee Wulff on these stamps would encapsulate these fly tying and fishing icons into history forever.

The following year Robert Redford directed, Norman Maclean’s semi-autographical story, the Academy Award winning film, A River Runs Through It.

In what the 1991 fly stamps probably didn’t accomplished, the movie fulfilled, and fly fishing would at least become a temporary household topic after seeing Brad Pitt fly fish.

There’s a growing number of people who collect conservation stamps.  Take for example, the federal duck stamp program, was created by President Hoover in 1929 when he signed the Migratory Bird Conservation Act. These stamps are cherished for both their beauty, value and the support they lend to conservation efforts around our nation. The funds raised from these stamps has gone towards the acquisition and preservation of wetlands as waterfowl habitat.

So the next time you think collecting stamps or coins is for geeks or wimps, think again. Sometimes it is the things you think mean the least, that end up meaning the most!

 

REDEFINING THE BASELINE

A young friend, excited by a masterpiece he had discovered, recently gave me a copy of the Zac Brown Band’s newest release. I’d heard of the band, a country band hailing from Georgia, because they’ve played the popular Bonnaroo music festival the past couple of years.

My friend told me how he’d been listening to this CD nonstop since he’d bought it a couple of weeks earlier. “It really talks to me, moves me. These are some of the best sounds I’ve heard for a long while,” he said as he handed the disk over with a big smile, delivering a final parting testimonial. “I believe you’re going to love it!”

He never even asked if I listen to country music.

Back in the day, less than a generation ago, when southern rock was actually played on Top 40 stations, it wasn’t unusual to hear songs from bands like the Allman Brothers, Marshal Tucker, Charlie Daniels and Lynyrd Skynyrd played on the radio. Their music was my baseline. Back then I was a real fan of southern rock. Today, it has all but disappeared from the mainstream.

While recently attending a NOAA Fisheries Snapper-Grouper Advisory Panel meeting in Charleston, S.C., part of our discussion centered on establishing a solid baseline to better manage important recreational and commercial species.

Baselines are typically perceived through the eyes and experiences of the person completing the analysis. For example, my sons’ idea of what makes up a good day of fishing is much different than what I perceived to be a good day of fishing when I was their age. It’s just the way it is; we see things differently through our own eyes. Back then, the fish were bigger and more plentiful. It’s the reason we call ‘em the good old days.

In today’s world of fishing, some of us old timers have had to redefine our baseline for success.

There was a time when we’d do almost anything to catch a fish. As a kid I’d use a weighted snatch hook to target lock jaw sheepshead sneaking around barnacle-covered pier pilings or black mullet from a tightly packed school. Back then I thought nothing of keeping a fat, spawning largemouth bass for dinner. Back then, I had to fill my cooler in order to proudly return home and consider the trip favorably.

But at some point the focus became more about tomorrow, more about the future of our fisheries—and less about how many fillets I could fit into my freezer or who I impressed at the dockside. It’s been nearly 30 years since I’ve killed a bass of any size. And the older I get, the more I value simply getting on the water and returning to the dock safely.

It’s all about redefining the baseline.

As much as I feel a tidbit reluctant to admit it, the Zac Brown Band’s new music is good. It includes many solid licks and meaningful lyrics. But looking back to 1973, when the Allman Brother’s “Rambling Man” could be heard on the radio—boy, those were the days.

Rodney Smith

 

AVOIDING MARINE MAMMALS

In today’s world of ever increasing concerns, anglers face a plethora of challenges when it comes to wildlife encounters on the water.

Not only is this important because there are state and federal laws protecting dolphins, manatee, whales, porpoise, seals and sea lions, but foremost because marine mammals play a critical role in our marine ecosystem. Also the majority of these animals are classified as depleted, endangered, or threatened. Of particular concern are the right, humpback, sperm and fin whales, as well as bottlenose dolphin, manatee and harbor porpoise.

First off it is illegal to feed any marine mammals. If these animals grow accustomed to eating bait, chum, released fish or any other handouts, they tend to lose their natural wariness of humans. Unfortunately acclimation to humans makes marine mammals more susceptible to gear entanglements and boat collisions. It also can increase the chances they lose their ability to forage in the wild, become “nuisance animals.”

How can you protect marine mammal? Avoid fishing in areas where marine mammals are active. Don’t chum or release fish into waters where these critters are feeding. NOAA Fisheries recommend staying at least 50 yards away from all dolphins, porpoise, and whales, and Federal law prohibits all approaches to right whales within 500 yards.

Common sense tells us it’s probably best to avoid catching and releasing fish in the presence of dolphin or seals. It’s understandably difficult for anglers to leave feeding fish to get away from “nuisance animals” however, these animals learn fast to follow boats catching fish and it becomes a chronic problem very quickly.

Of course, you don’t ever want to leave fishing gear unattended; or dispose of fishing line in the water. Even the small pieces of line or plastic can be harmful to marine mammals if entangled or ingested. You should also avoid dumping leftover bait, take it home and freeze it for your next trip. Use circle hook and corrodible hooks to reduce injure to fish, dolphins, and sea turtles. Periodically inspect your gear and  terminal tackle to avoid unwanted line breaks.
Here’s a few more common sense tips that should help you avoid dangerous and unlawful marine mammal encounters. Obey posted speed limits and “No Entry” areas and all local laws and regulations when fishing or boating in marine mammal areas. You can better protect marine mammal habitat by using push pole, paddle or a trolling motor when near grass beds.

Remember we can all do a better job of protecting the wonderful natural resources provided to us by being mindful of how we approach our fishing.